[libvirt] [PATCH] Increased upper limit on lists of pool names

[Jesse J. Cook]

256 (8 bits) is insufficient for large scale deployments. 65536 (16 bits) is a
more appropriate limit and should be sufficient. You are more likely to run
into other system limitations first, such as the 31998 inode link limit on
ext3.
---
 src/remote/remote_protocol.x |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
index 59774b2..58f0871 100644
--- a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
+++ b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ const REMOTE_INTERFACE_NAME_LIST_MAX = 256;
 const REMOTE_DEFINED_INTERFACE_NAME_LIST_MAX = 256;
 
 /* Upper limit on lists of storage pool names. */
-const REMOTE_STORAGE_POOL_NAME_LIST_MAX = 256;
+const REMOTE_STORAGE_POOL_NAME_LIST_MAX = 65536;
 
 /* Upper limit on lists of storage vol names. */
 const REMOTE_STORAGE_VOL_NAME_LIST_MAX = 1024;
-- 
1.7.2.5