[libvirt] [Users] Host missing ­cpuFlags

Jiri Denemark jdenemar at redhat.com
Fri May 4 13:49:22 UTC 2012


On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:48:23 +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 09:23 AM, ovirt at qip.ru wrote:
> > Engine is incorrectly show cpu name (cluster compatibility is set to 3.1)
> >
> > all hosts in my cluster engine are shown as Conroe, but I have 2 hosts
> > from Nehalem family and 2 from SandyBridge
> >
> > this host must be SandyBridge but shown as Conroe
> 
> vdsm reports the model at the end of the cpuFlags based on libvirt 
> reporting models. cc'ing libvirt list for their thoughts.

Hmm, at first glance, it seems like the features really describe
SandyBridge/Nehalem CPUs and not just Conroe. Could you provide the output of
``virsh capabilities'' (the subtree starting with <cpu> element is enough) run
on both types of hosts? Also, from the output you provided, it looks like you
are using libvirt 0.9.11.3, is that right?

Jirka




More information about the libvir-list mailing list