[libvirt] [libvirt-glib 5/5] Add gvir_config_domain_os_get_boot_devices()
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Fri May 11 13:38:52 UTC 2012
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 03:15:29PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:32:34PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 02:27:37PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 03:08:06PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> > > > The annotation is not supposed to be directly meant for humans, thats
> > > > why gtk-doc needs to do a better job. i-e the info is already there,
> > > > just needs translation.
> > >
> > > Yep, I don't know if gtk-doc uses the introspection information at all
> > > though (to be able to tell which functions should be used to free the
> > > container and which function should be used to free its content). In the
> > > mean time, I'd feel more comfortable if we explicitly say what should be
> > > done to free the returned data since that is one of the thing that I miss
> > > the most when using most C APIs
> >
> > If I look at the docs for GTK, I see GTK-DOC is including details of
> > the annotations:
> >
> > eg
> >
> > http://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkWindow.html#gtk-window-get-default-icon-list
> >
> > "Returns: copy of default icon list. [element-type GdkPixbuf][transfer container]"
>
> Forgot to mention that gtk+ also has a note saying how to free the return
> value, from your link: "The list is a copy and should be freed with
> g_list_free(), but the pixbufs in the list have not had their reference
> count incremented. "
Oh, I missed that. If anyone wishes to include such notes in the comments
for libvirt-glib I have no objection to this, either way.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list