[libvirt] [PATCH] lxc: return correct number of CPUs

[Martin Kletzander]

On 05/29/2012 06:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 01:12 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> When getting number of CPUs the host has assigned, there was always
>> number "1" returned. Even though all lxc domains with no pinning
>> launched by libvirt run on all pCPUs (by default, no matter what's the
>> number), we should at least return the same number as the user
>> specified when creating the domain.
>> ---
>> The bug addressed above will be managed later, because I believe this
>> needs to be discussed first (we don't say that <vcpu> is not supported
>> for lxc, but we are able to set only pinning, shares, not number of
>> CPUs; due to using cgroups). The question will be: "Should we change
>> the docs and ban it in the code or make some workaround for fixing
>> it?"
> 
> Is there no way to affect number of CPUs using just cgroups?  If so,
> then I would lean towards erroring out if <vcpu> is specified but not
> equal to the number of host cpus.  But like you say, that's a topic for
> a separate patch.
> 
>>
>>  src/lxc/lxc_driver.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
>> index 9aea556..33b2774 100644
>> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
>> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
>> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static int lxcDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr dom,
>>      }
>>
>>      info->maxMem = vm->def->mem.max_balloon;
>> -    info->nrVirtCpu = 1;
>> +    info->nrVirtCpu = vm->def->vcpus;
> 
> ACK - this patch is safe to apply now.
> 

Thanks, pushed.

Martin