[libvirt] [PATCH 0/4 v2] ivshmem support
jyang at redhat.com
Mon Nov 19 03:50:31 UTC 2012
On 2012年11月16日 21:24, Shawn Furrow wrote:
> Thanks for including me in the review of this patch. I can tell right
> away that your implementation is better. It's more modular and well
> documented. When I submitted my patch about a month ago, it was
> basically just me submitting the changes that I made to get ivshmem
> working for my lab. We were on a tight deadline and so a lot of the code
> is rushed and poorly pieced together. However, I am glad that my
> submission has helped at least get the ball rolling on memory device
> support for Libvirt as it is very much needed.
So do you see if the implementation satisfies your needs? I.e. Does
it work well in your lab?
More information about the libvir-list