[libvirt] [PATCHv3 2/3] util: new virSocketAddrIsPrivate function

Eric Blake eblake at redhat.com
Wed Nov 28 23:23:43 UTC 2012


----- Original Message -----
> This new function returns true if the given address is in the range
> of
> any "private" or "local" networks as defined in RFC1918 (IPv4) or
> RFC3484/RFC4193 (IPv6), otherwise they return false.
> 
> These ranges are:
> 
>    192.168.0.0/16
>    172.16.0.0/16
>    10.0.0.0/24
>    FC00::/7
>    FEC0::/10
> ---
>  src/libvirt_private.syms |  1 +
>  src/util/virsocketaddr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  src/util/virsocketaddr.h |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
>  
>  /*
> + * virSocketAddrIsPrivate:
> + * @s: the location of the IP address
> + *
> + * Return true if this address is in its family's defined
> + * "private/local" address space. For IPv4, private addresses are in
> + * the range of 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/16, or 10.0.0.0/8.  For
> + * IPv6, local addresses are in the range of FC00::/7.
> + *
> + * See RFC1918 and RFC4193 for details.

Did you intend to update this comment to match the commit message
regarding FEC0::/10?

> + */
> +bool
> +virSocketAddrIsPrivate(const virSocketAddrPtr addr)
> +{
> +    unsigned long val;
> +
> +    switch (addr->data.stor.ss_family) {
> +    case AF_INET:
> +       val = ntohl(addr->data.inet4.sin_addr.s_addr);
> +
> +       return ((val & 0xFFFF0000) == ((192L << 24) + (168 << 16)) ||
> +               (val & 0xFFFF0000) == ((172L << 24) + (16  << 16)) ||
> +               (val & 0xFF000000) == ((10L  << 24)));
> +
> +    case AF_INET6:
> +        return ((addr->data.inet6.sin6_addr.s6_addr[0] & 0xFC) ==
> 0xFC ||

Isn't this FC00::/6?  You should be using '& 0xFE' for /7.

ACK with those fixes.




More information about the libvir-list mailing list