[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] Proposed: replace radvd with dnsmasq for Router Advertizing

On 11/06/2012 01:56 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 11/06/2012 12:40 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/06/2012 11:50 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I am looking into an alternate method of obtaining the dnsmasq
version but the dnsmasq version will be the deciding rule for radvd
versus dnsmasq usage.
Try "dig  chaos  txt  version.bind"
Yeah, I saw that thread (I subscribed to dnsmasq-discuss last week). I
think that's overkill for what we're doing. running "dig" from libvirt
just increases the number of external binaries we're dependent on, but
you still need to parse the text output. Is there any reason for
preferring this over simply running "dnsmasq --help"? (other than maybe
hoping that the output would be less likely to change format over time).
I actually think that it's more important to reduce the count of
external binary dependencies...

It is not clear to me how to make "dig" work anyway ... dnsmasq is not running yet. So it is back to doing "dnsmasq --version" and capturing the output in a buffer. Then parsing the buffer for the release and setting a flag appropriately. Once the flag is set, the actually doing the code to use dnsmasq or radvd is "simple". Development is a "work in progress." Naturally, I am doing this on top of the three patches I submitted earlier today.

For the version, I am going to be looking for "2.63" or later. Besides being for radvd versus dnsmasq, for DHCPv6 I could add a warning if it was 2.63 and deny/fail/ignore DHCPv6 definitions if it was earlier. Overkill?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]