[libvirt] [PATCH 1/6] Fix virDiskNameToIndex to actually ignore partition numbers
Martin Kletzander
mkletzan at redhat.com
Fri Nov 23 08:13:31 UTC 2012
On 11/22/2012 05:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com>
>
> The docs for virDiskNameToIndex claim it ignores partition
> numbers. In actual fact though, a code ordering buy means
s/buy/bug/
> that a partition number will cause the code to accidentally
> multiply the result by 26.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com>
> ---
> src/util/util.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/util.c b/src/util/util.c
> index 75b18c1..2fd0f2c 100644
> --- a/src/util/util.c
> +++ b/src/util/util.c
> @@ -2193,11 +2193,10 @@ int virDiskNameToIndex(const char *name) {
> return -1;
>
> for (i = 0; *ptr; i++) {
> - idx = (idx + (i < 1 ? 0 : 1)) * 26;
> -
> if (!c_islower(*ptr))
> break;
>
> + idx = (idx + (i < 1 ? 0 : 1)) * 26;
> idx += *ptr - 'a';
> ptr++;
> }
>
ACK,
Martin
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list