[libvirt] [PATCH V4] implement offline migration
liguang
lig.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com
Thu Sep 6 05:32:46 UTC 2012
Hello, Eric & Daniel
在 2012-09-05三的 11:08 -0600,Eric Blake写道:
> On 09/05/2012 02:48 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I really don't like the general design of this patch, even
> >>> ignoring all the code bugs. I think this entire patch is
> >>> really just a solution in search of a problem. Offline migration
> >>> is already possible with existing libvirt APIs:
>
> I agree that the existing patches are making too many assumptions and
> not honoring flags correctly; but I'm still not sure why the user must
> decompose offline migration into a sequence of calls...
yes, my original thought was to do all things together.
>
> >>>
> >>> domsrc = virDomainLookupByName(connsrc, "someguest");
> >>> xml = virDomainGetXMLDesc(domsrc);
> >>> domdst virDomainDefine(conndst, xml);
> >>>
> >>
> >> Um, maybe you mean offline migration is just redefinition of domain at
> >> target side, but what about disk images the domain used without sharing
> >> files between source and target, do we have to take a look at this case?
> >
> > Which can also be done already
> >
> > virStorageVolDownload + virStorageVolUpload
>
> ...when a single virMigrate API could do the same decomposition as
> syntactic sugar, if the patch were cleaned up to actually obey flags.
> That is, why must virMigrate be a live-only operation, forcing
> virt-manager and all other wrappers to re-implement the same giant
> sequence of API calls for offline migration?
>
so, libvirt may prefer APIs do one thing only?
maybe I have to just migrate the definition.
--
liguang lig.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com
FNST linux kernel team
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list