[libvirt] [libvirt-designer PATCHv2 1/3] Add driver handling methods to GVirDesignerDomain

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:46:18AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 18.04.2013 18:08, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > They are useful to tell libvirt-designer about which drivers
> > are install/will be installed in the OS associated with the domain.
> > This in turns allows libvirt-designer code to use these devices
> > when it's making some guesses about what to enable/not enable
> > in the VM being created.
> > ---
> >  libvirt-designer/libvirt-designer-domain.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  libvirt-designer/libvirt-designer-domain.h |  5 ++
> >  libvirt-designer/libvirt-designer.sym      |  3 ++
> >  3 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 
> > diff --git a/libvirt-designer/libvirt-designer.sym b/libvirt-designer/libvirt-designer.sym
> > index 7a24f2c..1dab447 100644
> > --- a/libvirt-designer/libvirt-designer.sym
> > +++ b/libvirt-designer/libvirt-designer.sym
> > @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ LIBVIRT_DESIGNER_0.0.1 {
> >  	gvir_designer_domain_get_platform;
> >  	gvir_designer_domain_get_capabilities;
> >  
> > +	gvir_designer_domain_add_driver;
> > +	gvir_designer_domain_remove_all_drivers;
> > +
> >  	gvir_designer_domain_add_cdrom_file;
> >  	gvir_designer_domain_add_cdrom_device;
> >  	gvir_designer_domain_add_disk_file;
> > 
> 
> 
> I just realized, shouldn't these new symbols go to into new section
> LIBVIRT_DESIGNER_0.0.2?

IIRC, we explicitly broke ABI, so we should be incrementing the
soname and moving all symbols to a new version block

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|