[libvirt] [PATCH] doc: Clarify usage of SELinux baselabel
Peter Krempa
pkrempa at redhat.com
Wed Apr 24 17:41:13 UTC 2013
On 04/24/13 17:57, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/24/2013 07:30 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> State what fields are used when generating SELinux labels from a
>> baselabel.
>> ---
>> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>> index 888c005..9118ff0 100644
>> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>> @@ -4596,8 +4596,13 @@ qemu-kvm -net nic,model=? /dev/null
>> </dd>
>> <dt><code>baselabel</code></dt>
>> <dd>If dynamic labelling is used, this can optionally be
>> - used to specify the base security label. The format
>> - of the content depends on the security driver in use.
>> + used to specify the base security label that will be used to generate
>> + the actual label. The format of the content depends on the security
>> + driver in use.
>> +
>> + The SELinux driver uses only the <code>type</code> field of the
>> + baselabel in the generated label. Other fields are inherited from
>> + the parent process when using SELinux baselabels.
>
> ACK - definite improvement.
>
> Hmm - we already gave the example of:
> <baselabel>system_u:system_r:my_svirt_t:s0</baselabel>
>
> Would it help to mention here that in the example above, the baselabel
> uses only the 'my_svirt_t' portion of the given label?
>
Something along:
(The example above demonstrates the use of <code>my_svirt_t</code> as
the value for the <code>type</code> field.) ?
Peter
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list