[libvirt] [PATCH 1/3] util: Add a helper to check if all bits of a bitmap are clear
Osier Yang
jyang at redhat.com
Tue Apr 2 12:01:31 UTC 2013
On 02/04/13 18:52, John Ferlan wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 01:42 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
>> ---
>> src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
>> src/util/virbitmap.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/util/virbitmap.h | 3 +++
>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
> Since there already is a "virBitmapIsAllSet()" - why isn't it used? I
> see callers which do "if (virBitmapIsAllSet(...)" and "if
> (!virBitmapIsAllSet(...)".
I want to check if the bitmap is all zero. Obviously !virBitmapIsAllSet
can't do it.
>
> If you're going to have a AllClear(), then why not change those !
> callers to use AllClear()...
>
> I only wonder about the last comparison - it's the "-1" logic that
> throws me off especially since the IsAllSet() code is doing a comparison.
>
> It also stands to reason that tests/virbitmaptest.c could add new tests
> to ensure you did get the logic right.
Agreed. I didn't notice this. Will add.
Osier
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list