[libvirt] [PATCH 1/3] util: Add a helper to check if all bits of a bitmap are clear

Osier Yang jyang at redhat.com
Tue Apr 2 12:01:31 UTC 2013


On 02/04/13 18:52, John Ferlan wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 01:42 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
>> ---
>>   src/libvirt_private.syms |  1 +
>>   src/util/virbitmap.c     | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   src/util/virbitmap.h     |  3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
> Since there already is a "virBitmapIsAllSet()" - why isn't it used?  I
> see callers which do "if (virBitmapIsAllSet(...)" and "if
> (!virBitmapIsAllSet(...)".

I want to check if the bitmap is all zero. Obviously !virBitmapIsAllSet
can't do it.

>
> If you're going to have a AllClear(), then why not change those !
> callers to use AllClear()...
>
> I only wonder about the last comparison - it's the "-1" logic that
> throws me off especially since the IsAllSet() code is doing a comparison.
>
> It also stands to reason that tests/virbitmaptest.c could add new tests
> to ensure you did get the logic right.

Agreed. I didn't notice this. Will add.

Osier




More information about the libvir-list mailing list