[libvirt] persistent virtual networks

Serge Hallyn serge.hallyn at canonical.com
Fri Feb 1 18:00:22 UTC 2013


Quoting Gene Czarcinski (gene at czarc.net):
> I seem to remember that, if you use net-define, the network will be
> persistent and, if you use net-create, the network will not be
> persistent.
> 
> I am now running libvirt-1.0.2 on Fedora 18.
> 
> When I use net-define a network from a template and then do a
> net-list --all, the network is NOT marked as persistent.  If I
> restart libvirtd.service, then the defined networks are persistent.
> 
> I noticed that the libvirt-1.0.2 announcement included:
> - network: bridge: Fix regression when defining persistent networks
> (Peter Krempa)
> 
> Do I have a bug to report?

Sounds like it, though I can confirm that the commit you cite above
fixed it for me, and 1.0.2 does the right thing here.

-serge




More information about the libvir-list mailing list