[libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] Clear PIIX3/PIIX4_USB capabilities for non-X86 platforms

Li Zhang zhlcindy at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 11:47:47 UTC 2013


On 2013年02月28日 19:39, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:39:56 +0800, Li Zhang wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Li Zhang <zhlcindy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I also hope that QEMU capabilities depend on the binary by QMP.
>>> But the flags in virQEMUCapsObjectTypes are all set in virQEMUCapsInitQMP.
>>>
>>> virQEMUCapsInitQMP -> virQEMUCapsProbeQMPObjects ->
>>>                                    virQEMUCapsProcessStringFlags(qemuCaps,
>>>
>>> ARRAY_CARDINALITY(virQEMUCapsObjectTypes),
>>>                                    virQEMUCapsObjectTypes,
>>>                                    nvalues, values);
> Yes, but that's fine, virQEMUCapsObjectTypes is just a lookup table
> between qom objects and our internal qemu capabilities flags.
> virQEMUCapsProcessStringFlags will only set flags corresponding to the
> qom objects reported by qemu.
>
>> More information from QEMU:
>>
>> I tried to execute  "qom-list-types" command, I get a lot of return values
>> including X86 and other platforms.
> I think this is the real problem. QEMU binary emulating PPC architecture
> should not advertise x86-specific objects.

It seems that command "qom-list-types" just give all architectures' 
list, not related with architecture.
qemu-system-x86_64 also can get all information of other architectures.

I think it is not right way to getting capabilities by "qom-list-types".

To fix this problem can be either way of the following:
1. Specify the architectures in Libvirt as my patch.
2. Specify the architectures in QEMU by modifying "qom-list-types" command.

In my opinion, it may be better to fix it in libvirt. :)

> Jirka




More information about the libvir-list mailing list