[libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] Using client-id for DHCPv6 host identification

Gene Czarcinski gene at czarc.net
Fri Feb 15 19:12:13 UTC 2013


On 02/15/2013 02:02 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> The first patch is a trivial fix to the network schema
> since the name in dhcp-host is really optional.
>
> The second patch adds the capability to use the client id
> to improve the reliability of having a system use a fixed
> IPv6 address.
>
> Gene Czarcinski (2):
>    Trivial fix: in dhcp-host the name is optional
>    use client id for IPv6 DHCP host definition
>
>   docs/formatnetwork.html.in                         | 18 ++++++-
>   docs/schemas/basictypes.rng                        | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   docs/schemas/network.rng                           |  7 ++-
>   src/conf/network_conf.c                            | 29 +++++++++--
>   src/conf/network_conf.h                            |  1 +
>   src/network/bridge_driver.c                        |  3 +-
>   src/util/virdnsmasq.c                              | 20 ++++++--
>   src/util/virdnsmasq.h                              |  1 +
>   tests/networkxml2confdata/dhcp6-nat-network.xml    |  5 +-
>   tests/networkxml2confdata/dhcp6-network.xml        |  5 +-
>   .../dhcp6host-routed-network.xml                   |  5 +-
>   11 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
When I originally submitted the patches for DHCPv6 I thought that using 
the host name for specifying hosts with fixed IPv6 addresses would 
work.  Lots of testing proved that to be a foolish assumption.  The only 
thing that works is to specify the ID (Client ID).  This has been 
testing with DUID-LLT, DUID-LL, and DUID-UUID.

One of the most difficult parts in this was getting the patterns in the 
schemas correct for the various types of DUID.  I think I have tested 
them sufficiently but ???  One of the more difficult things was to 
handle bytes where the leading zero is suppressed.

Gene




More information about the libvir-list mailing list