[libvirt] [PATCH 3/6] Introduce new XMLs to specify disk source using storage pool/vol

Osier Yang jyang at redhat.com
Mon Jan 28 04:27:15 UTC 2013


On 2013年01月26日 03:12, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 10:44 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
>>
>> So you agreed with just using the "pool name and volume name"?
>
> I think so. Unless you can think of a situation where the pool or volume
> name legitimately wouldn't be known, or would be required to be
> different from one machine to another in spite of the path/key/etc being
> the same.

Hum, this inspires me thinking about the migration. The source and
dest host could have pool && vol with the same name. However, the
vol's content could be different. I.E, in this case, we will need
the globally unique $IDs (pool UUID, and/or vol key).

>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




More information about the libvir-list mailing list