[libvirt] [PATCH 30/31] nwfitler: Change the comment style

Osier Yang jyang at redhat.com
Tue May 21 15:39:50 UTC 2013


On 21/05/13 23:35, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 04:01 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
>> The more common habit is to add the comment after the statements.
>> ---
>>   src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c b/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
>> index b9921e5..451c783 100644
>> --- a/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
>> +++ b/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_dhcpsnoop.c
>> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ virNWFilterSnoopListAdd(virNWFilterSnoopIPLeasePtr plnew,
>>   
>>       for (pl = *end; pl && plnew->timeout < pl->timeout;
>>            pl = pl->prev)
>> -        /* empty */ ;
>> +        ; /* empty */
> How did you determine which style was more common?  Do you have 'git
> grep | wc' numbers to back your claim?  I guess putting the comment
> after makes it easier to avoid false positives in patch 31?

Yes, you are right. :-)

As far I saw when writing the script to exclude the empty statements,
all other comments for an empty statements are after ";"

>
> I did notice a couple of empty while loops in earlier patches (let me
> search for them again...)
>
> found it: patch 8/31.  Reply coming up there, soon.
>
> ACK to all patches up to 30 where I didn't explicitly reply.

Pushed 1 to 30. Thanks.

>
> Weak ack to this one (I don't care if it goes in, but I also don't mind
> if it gets omitted).
>
I leave this one for more opinion, if there is no more opinion till
tomorrow, will push it.




More information about the libvir-list mailing list