[libvirt] [PATCH 02/18] qemumonitorjsontest: Test qemuMonitorJSONSystemPowerdown

Michal Privoznik mprivozn at redhat.com
Thu Oct 3 10:44:20 UTC 2013


On 02.10.2013 20:08, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:42:13AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 10/02/2013 11:09 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> Right now, we are testing qemuMonitorSystemPowerdown instead of
>>> qemuMonitorJSONSystemPowerdown. It makes no harm, as both functions have
>>> the same header and the former is just a wrapper over the latter. But we
>>> should be consistent as we're testing the JSON functions only in here.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  tests/qemumonitorjsontest.c | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Actually, I think we should do the opposite, and test only the wrapper
>> functions that the rest of qemu_driver.c and friends will be calling.
>> For example, testQemuMonitorJSONGetVersion() calls into
>> qemuMonitorGetVersion, not qemuMonitorJSONGetVersion.
> 
> Well this test suite was specifically targetting only the JSON monitor
> impl, not the text mode impl, so calling the JSON functions is
> right IMHO.
> 
> There is separate testing for the text mode monitor
> 
> Daniel
> 

Does this mean ACK, esp. if other patches calling JSON functions were acked?

Michal




More information about the libvir-list mailing list