[libvirt] [PATCHv2 2/4] virsocket: Introduce virSocketAddrIsWildcard
Ján Tomko
jtomko at redhat.com
Thu Oct 10 14:27:08 UTC 2013
On 10/09/2013 03:32 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> This function takes exactly one argument: an address to check.
> It returns true, iff the address is an IPv4 or IPv6 address in numeric
Why use "iff" if you still need to say what happens otherwise? :)
> format, false if otherwise (e.g. for "examplehost").
s/ if//
> @@ -824,3 +839,27 @@ virSocketAddrGetIpPrefix(const virSocketAddrPtr address,
> */
> return 0;
> }
Missing space.
> +/**
> + * virSocketAddrIsNumeric:
> + * @address: address to check
> + *
> + * Check if passed address is an IP address in numeric format. For
> + * instance, for 0.0.0.0 true is returned, for 'examplehost"
> + * false is returned.
> + *
> + * Returns: true iff @address is an IP address,
See my comment for the commit message.
> + * false otherwise
> + */
> +bool
> +virSocketAddrIsNumeric(const char *address)
> +{
> + struct addrinfo *res;
> + unsigned short family;
> +
> + if (virSocketAddrParseInternal(&res, address, AF_UNSPEC, false) < 0)
> + return false;
> +
> + family = res->ai_addr->sa_family;
Is this any different than using int res->ai_family?
> + freeaddrinfo(res);
> + return family == AF_INET || family == AF_INET6;
> +}
ACK
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list