[libvirt] [PATCH]lxc: fix an improper comment in lxc_process

[Chen Hanxiao]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Osier Yang [mailto:jyang at redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 3:34 PM
> To: Chen Hanxiao
> Cc: libvir-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH]lxc: fix an improper comment in lxc_process
> 
> On 14/10/13 14:22, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
> > From: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao at cn.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > Fix an improper comment when libvirt has released all resources
> > for lxc.
> > Then original comment says "stopped" rather than "released".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao at cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >   src/lxc/lxc_process.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_process.c b/src/lxc/lxc_process.c
> > index d07ff13..7746c9b 100644
> > --- a/src/lxc/lxc_process.c
> > +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_process.c
> > @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void virLXCProcessCleanup(virLXCDriverPtr
> driver,
> >       virSystemdTerminateMachine(vm->def->name, "lxc", true);
> >
> >
> > -    /* now that we know it's stopped call the hook if present */
> 
> I see no problem here, given that "it" means the vm process here. It
> might be better to have a comma after "stopped" though, with explicitly
> pointing out what "it" stands for. I.e.
> 
In this function will handle two scenario: 
a) a LXC guest is stopped
b) libvirt has released all resources

But the comments are the SAME. That are not what intended.
I think it's more clear if we could distinguish them.

> /* now that we know the vm process is stopped, call the hook if present */
> 
> 
> Osier