[libvirt] [v0.9.12-maint 08/11] Make sure regree is called close to it's usage

[Eric Blake]

On 09/12/2013 03:35 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> I wasn't aware that my patch had been posted upstream.

Yeah, my unfortunate email addressing was due to a glitch in the way
Guido posted the existing Debian patch queue for 0.9.12 to upstream,
such that my usual 'reply-to-all' sent to the wrong people based on the
awkward headers.  No worries.

> Ok, something like this then?
> 
>>From 4b2a860148a3e9f41136f135449d5aa53b5824e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:44:26 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] storage: Need to also VIR_FREE(reg)
> 
> Commit-id 'afc4631b' added the regfree(reg) to free resources alloc'd
> during regcomp; however, reg still needed to be VIR_FREE()'d. The call
> to regfree() also didn't account for possible NULL value.  Reformatted
> the call to be closer to usage.
> (cherry picked from commit 71da3b66a8455faf8019effe3cf504a31f91f54a)
> 
> Backported to 0.9.12 with afc4631b and its revert skipped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti <ltettamanti at acunu.com>

Yes, I like that better than Guido's re-post at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-September/msg00676.html

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 621 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20130912/24532ac6/attachment-0001.sig>