[libvirt] [PATCH] spec: Only distribute ChangeLog in -devel package
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Wed Sep 4 15:11:27 UTC 2013
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:02:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 08:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:24:06AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >> Helps save space on the Fedora livecd, as requested here:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977099
> >> ---
> >> libvirt.spec.in | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> >>
> >> +%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.gz NEWS README COPYING COPYING.LESSER TODO
> >> %doc docs/*.html docs/html docs/*.gif
> >> %doc docs/libvirt-api.xml
> >> %doc examples/hellolibvirt
> >
> > The subject says you're moving the ChangeLog file, but you're in fact
> > moving all docs files. I don't think it is right to move the COPYING
> > and COPYING.LESSER files - I think those should say in libvirt-client
> > so that they're always present for any possible libvirt sub-RPM install.
>
> Oh, good point.
>
> That means:
>
> client: COPYING COPYING.LESSER
> daemon: none
> other[*]: AUTHORS ChangeLog.gz NEWS README TODO
>
> where I have yet another question: should the other package be
> libvirt-docs or libvirt-devel? Your patch put them in devel, but I
> think docs might be a better fit.
Oh, I didn't realize we had a -docs package. I just looked at
-devel and saw the website docs and didn't look further. It
seems we're duplicating website in both -docs and -devel
which is bad. We should remove those website docs from -devel
and have all docs related stuff in -docs
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list