[libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] tests: Don't test user config file if ran as root

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 01:48:31PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 01:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 01:28:45PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan at redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  tests/virsh-uriprecedence | 6 +++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/virsh-uriprecedence b/tests/virsh-uriprecedence
> >> index f4d84a4..aa90efe 100755
> >> --- a/tests/virsh-uriprecedence
> >> +++ b/tests/virsh-uriprecedence
> >> @@ -56,7 +56,11 @@ bad_uri="test:///default?bad_uri"
> >>  good_uri="test:///default?good_uri"
> >>
> >>  printf "uri_default=\"%s\"\n" "$good_uri" >"$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/libvirt/libvirt.conf"
> >> -test_uri "User config file"
> >> +if uid_is_privileged_; then
> >> +    test_skip_case "$counter" "User config file" "must be run as root"
> > 
> > 
> > Should that say 'must not be run as root'  ?
> >                       ^^^
> 
> Yes, should, fixed.
> 
> > 
> >> +else
> >> +    test_uri "User config file"
> >> +fi
> >>
> >>  printf "uri_default=\"%s\"\n" "$bad_uri" >"$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/libvirt/libvirt.conf"
> >>  export LIBVIRT_DEFAULT_URI="$good_uri"
> > 
> > ACK if you can answer the question either way.
> > 
> 
> Thanks, should I wait for ACK on 1/2 before pushing or have you seen
> that in the archives?

Odd, I've not see any cover letter or 1/2 patch arrive.


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|