[libvirt] Can I request a new release of libvirt-java?

[Wido den Hollander]

On 09/16/2013 07:58 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>    Raising this due to maven
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:26:24PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>>>
>>>
> [...]
>>
>>    Indeed that was the problem, I just commited the fix, thanks !
>

Somewhat related to this: It seems you have compiled with Java 7 causing 
the bindings not to work with Java 6.

A lot of users are still running Java 6 on their systems.

You could do this with in build.xml:

<javac target="1.6" .../>

Or something like:

<property name="javac.target" value="1.6" />
..
<javac target="${javac.target}" .../>

Java 6 is still around and I think it should be supported for older 
platforms.

Wido

>    Hum, getting back on-list, I pushed everything including maven
> files at their location, unfortunately this never shows up in repos
>
>   Seems that to be indexed one need to push to an expernal repo
> within that small list:
>
> "Instead of maintaining repository rsync feeds for each projects, we now
> encourage projects to use an approved repository hosting location.
>
> Currently approved repository hosting locations:
>
>      Apache Software Foundation (for all Apache projects)
>      Codehaus (for Codehaus projects)
>      FuseSource Forge (focused on FUSE related projects)
>      Nuiton.org
> "
>
>   We are definitely not Apache Software Foundation, nor Codehaus, nor
> FuseSource, and I have no idea what Nuiton.org might be nor intent to
> push to a random place.
>
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html
>
> "
> Explanations
>
> Having each project maintain its own repository with rsync to Central
> Repository used to be the preferred process until January 2010. But we
> are no longer accepting rsync requests on a per project basis.
>
> Over time, we have learned that this process is not scalable. Many of
> the projects being synced release very infrequently, yet we have to hit
> hundreds of servers several times a day looking for artifacts that don't
> change. Additionally, there is no good mechanism currently for
> validating the incoming data via the rsync, and this leads to bad
> metadata that affects everyone.
>
> The aggregation of projects into single larger feeds allows us to sync
> faster and more often, and ensuring these locations perform sufficient
> checks increases the quality of metadata for everyone."
>
>
>    As a result current repos only list libvirt-java up to 0.4.7 and none
> of the newer versions.
>
>    Repository are evil, and they built a solution based on those.
> The bug is on their side, I won't upload to $random_site, so unless
> someone else pulls from libvirt.org, libvirt-java maven won't index
> more recent build.
>
> Daniel
>