[libvirt] [PATCH 2/3] tests: Only use privileged mode if Qemu user and group exists

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Tue Apr 8 09:09:59 UTC 2014


On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:40:24PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 02:02 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
> > When building packages in a clean chroot the QEMU_USER and QEMU_GROUP
> > don't exist making VirQemuDriverConfigNew fail with privileged=true.
> > 
> > Avoid that by not requiring priviliged mode and skipping tests that need
> 
> s/priviliged/privileged/
> 
> > it.
> > ---
> >  tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> Seems like this is what avoids the fail pointed out in 1/3.  It still
> feels fishy that our testsuite is that dependent on the system (ideally,
> we'd provide a way to mock things up so that creating the config file
> NEVER fails when run from the testsuite, even if the uid doesn't exist -
> because we shouldn't be probing the live system, only our mockups).  I'd
> wait for a second opinion on whether this patch is papering over a
> bigger problem of depending on the current system state, or whether it
> is an acceptable way to avoid the issue without investing the effort to
> tackle at the uid lookup level.

IMHO we should be passing  privileged == false unconditionally, so that
we always skip any magic username lookups.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list