[libvirt] maint: backport of 736e017e and friends

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:28:35PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> I wanted to back-port 736e017e as requested in Bug 1058149 [1],
> because it fixes a crash.  However, it requires 5b3492fa and e9d09fe1
> to be back-ported as well, so I wanted to confirm it's still OK when
> it's not a simple two-liner or similar (and combined with the low
> probability of the crash to happen).  What's the stand on this?

If they cherry-pick cleanly, or with trivial resolution then it
is fine to backport them to -maint branches without re-posting
for review IMHO.

If they have nasty conflicts to resolve, then post the backport for
review first in normal way.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|