[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] Couple more Coverity issues




On 08/28/2014 03:28 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> After perusing the pile of 70 or so warnings - these two stuck out as
> ones that were low hanging fruit and not false positives.
> 
> Many of the remaining "issues" are false positives or perhaps even
> bugs in Coverity, but I understand why they're being flagged. Freeing
> memory from counted lists where the incoming count must be zero based
> on code path - for some reason Coverity flags them because the incoming
> list memory is NULL and the for loop deref would be bad. The issue
> is Coverity doesn't seem to dig deep enough to determine that the
> count and list pointer are linked, sigh (yes, a lot of those).
> 
> John Ferlan (2):
>   virnetserverservice: Resolve Coverity ARRAY_VS_SINGLETON
>   qemu_driver: Resolve Coverity FORWARD_NULL
> 
>  src/qemu/qemu_driver.c        | 3 +--
>  src/rpc/virnetserverservice.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Both are now pushed.

John


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]