[libvirt] [PATCH] Write up the project governance process
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Tue Feb 4 11:21:23 UTC 2014
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:23:46PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/03/2014 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The project has historically operated as a meritocratic
> > consensus based community. Formally document what has
> > always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community
> > participants. Also include an explicit code of conduct
> > to prempt any potential, but unlikely, future problems.
> > + <li>User help: join the IRC channel or mailing list to assist or advice
> > + other users in troubleshooting the problems they face.</li>
>
> Here would be an ideal place to add <a href...> pointing to the contact
> page, so someone can actually find the IRC channel or list :)
Good idea.
>
> > + <li>Code review: look at patches which are submitted and critique
> > + the code to identify bugs, potential design problems or other
> > + issues which should be addressed before the code is accepted</li>
>
> Maybe even mention that merely testing a build with the proposed patch
> applied, without actually understanding the code, is also a valid form
> of review.
I've added another bullet point about testing patches + release candidates.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list