[libvirt] [PATCH 2/4] domain: parse and format os.bootStrict from/to XML
Laszlo Ersek
lersek at redhat.com
Fri Feb 7 14:07:38 UTC 2014
On 02/07/14 15:00, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:33:20AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 9 +++++++++
>> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 10 ++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
>
>> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>> index ff50214..bf21c46 100644
>> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
>> <boot dev='hd'/>
>> <boot dev='cdrom'/>
>> <bootmenu enable='yes'/>
>> + <boot-strict enable='yes'/>
>> <smbios mode='sysinfo'/>
>> <bios useserial='yes' rebootTimeout='0'/>
>> </os>
>
> Reviving the thread. Based on the discussions, I think I now agree that
> your suggestion to allow toggle of strict mode is probably our least
> worst way forward.
>
> I'd suggest that instead of introducing a new element here, we add
> an attribute to the <bios> element. eg perhaps this:
>
> <bios bootPolicy="strict|fallback">
>
>
> BTW, as a general goal we want all the parsing/xml related changes
> in one patch. So your patches 1 + 2 could be squashed together.
Oh, I've implemented HALT parsing in OVMF since. See
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/c3cf8daa
I considered the issue solved, with the above OVMF commit. Do you still
want me to rework this libvirt series? I can if you want me to.
Thanks,
Laszlo
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list