[libvirt] [ruby-libvirt] Don't free more entries than we retrieved
Chris Lalancette
clalancette at gmail.com
Tue Jan 7 21:31:23 UTC 2014
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Guido Günther <agx at sigxcpu.org> wrote:
> The check for < 0 might be superfluos but freeing num entries instead of
> only r ones looks wrong to me since r is the number of allocated names,
> not num. I'm happy to send a patch dropping the < 0 part.
Oh, bah humbug. Yeah, you are definitely right about that.
Please do send a patch with just the num -> r bit. That is definitely a bug.
Thanks,
Chris
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list