[libvirt] Follow-up on .so version number question

[Eric Blake]

On 07/07/2014 12:35 PM, Tony Asleson wrote:
> Eric posted this a while back (ref:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-April/msg00226.html)
> without any apparent response/discussion.
> 
> Can someone please elaborate on this?

At this point, we really aren't too worried about libtool versioning
scheme.  We've kept our guarantee of library back-compat ever since that
email, with no complaints, so I'm not sure that changing anything now
makes any sense (I'm more worried about breaking status quo than I am
about violating libtool documentation suggestions)

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 604 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20140707/7b849ef6/attachment-0001.sig>