[libvirt] [PATCH v5 1/3] add new virDomainCoreDumpWithFormat API

qiaonuohan at cn.fujitsu.com qiaonuohan at cn.fujitsu.com
Sun Mar 16 09:48:13 UTC 2014


On 03/13/2014 03:42 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:29:55AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> >  On 03/12/2014 09:04 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> >  >  On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:35:47AM +0000,qiaonuohan at cn.fujitsu.com  wrote:
>>>> >  >>  --memory-only option is introduced without compression supported. Therefore,
>>>> >  >>  this is a freature regression of virsh dump. Now qemu has support dumping memory
>>> >  >
>>> >  >  s/freature/feature/
>>> >  >
>>> >  >  but I would not use the word "regression" since that never worked.
>>> >  >  Also it would help mentioning the commit ID or a version it
>>> >  >  got included in qemu.  On that note, is there a possibility of
>>> >  >  of introspection of that feature, so we can gracefully error out in
>>> >  >  case older qemu is used?
>> >
>> >  Yes - qemu 2.0 is adding 'query-dump-guest-memory-capability', which can
>> >  be used for two purposes: 1. if this command exists, 'dump-guest-memory'
>> >  supports the new optional 'format' argument; and 2. calling this command
>> >  will return a list of WHICH formats are supported by the given qemu
>> >  binary (since configure-time choices can disable some of the formats
>> >  from actually working).  So you need to have a patch that modifies
>> >  src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.[ch] to do the probing and set capability
>> >  bits, so that we can gracefully error out when talking to a too-old
>> >  qemu, or requesting a format that was not compiled in to a new qemu.
>> >
> Great.  Could we have the compression parameter just as an arbitrary
> string then (properly checked for, etc.) so there is no need to adapt
> our code to qemu format additions?
>

Hello,

Sorry about the late of this reply.

I just added a patch using 'query-dump-guest-memory-capability' to check the
string of 'dumpformat' to see if the format is supported, so src/qemu
/qemu_capabilities.[ch] is not touched. And this is reflected in v6, please
  check.

-- 
Regards
Qiao Nuohan




More information about the libvir-list mailing list