[libvirt] [PATCH]execute netdev_del after receive DEVICE_DELETED event

Jiri Denemark jdenemar at redhat.com
Thu Mar 27 14:14:06 UTC 2014


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 20:51:24 +0800, x00221466 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When live detaching the virtual net device, such as virtio nic、
> RTL8139、E1000, there are some problems:
> 
> (1)If the Guest OS don't support the hot plugging pci device, detach
> the virtual network device by Libvirt, the "net device" in Qemu will
> still exist, but "hostnet"(tap) in Qemu will be removed. so the net device
> in Guest OS will be of no effect.
> 
> (2)If reject the nic in Guest OS, Qemu will remove the "net device",
> then Qemu send DEVICE_DELETED to Libvirt, Libvirt receive the event
> in event-loop thread and release info of the net device in
> qemuDomainRemoveNetDevice func. but "hostnet" in Qemu still exist.
> So next live attaching virtual net device will be failed because of
> "Duplicate ID".
> 
> #virsh attach-device win2008_st_r2_64 net.xml --live
> error: Failed to attach device from net.xml
> error: internal error: unable to execute QEMU command 'netdev_add':
> Duplicate ID 'hostnet0' for netdev
> 
> (3)In addition, in qemuDomainDetachNetDevice, detach net device func,
> "netdev_del" command will be sent after sending "device_del" command
> at once. So it is violent to remove the tap device before the net device
> is completely removed.
> 
> So I think it's more logical that doing the work of sending Qemu command
> "netdev_del" after receive the DEVICE_DELETED event. It can avoid the conflict
> of device info between Libvirt side and Qemu side.

This sounds like it could be correct, although I'd prefer Laine to
express his opinion on this since he knows the corners in network device
assignment...

> I create a thread in qemuDomainRemoveDevice,the handle of DEVICE_DELETED event,
> to execute QEMU command "netdev_del".

Hmm, it took me some time to realize why you'd need to do this. It's
because qemuDomainRemoveDevice is run from a DEVICE_DELETED event
handler and thus it cannot talk back to the monitor, right? In that
case, I suggest spawning a thread for qemuDomainRemoveDevice itself
within the event handler (qemuProcessHandleDeviceDeleted) so that all
qemuDomainRemove* methods can talk to monitor if they need to.

To make the changes easier to follow, please do the change in two
patches. The first one to move qemuDomainRemoveDevice into a new thread
and the second one to move qemuMonitorRemoveNetdev and
qemuMonitorRemoveHostNetwork calls inside qemuDomainRemoveNetDevice.

But first, wait for Laine's input, please.

Jirka




More information about the libvir-list mailing list