[libvirt] [PATCH v2] Move the FIPS detection from capabilities
Pavel Hrdina
phrdina at redhat.com
Fri Sep 19 07:11:24 UTC 2014
On 09/18/2014 09:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/18/2014 12:01 PM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>> We are not detecting the presence of FIPS from QEMU, but from procfs and
>> that means it's not QEMU capability. It was decided that we will pass
>> this flag to QEMU even if it's not supported by old QEMU binaries.
>>
>> This patch also reverts changes done by commit a21cfb0f to
>> qemucapabilitestest and implements a new test case in qemuxml2argvtest.
>>
>> Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135431
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina at redhat.com>
>> ---
>
>> @@ -183,19 +176,16 @@ mymain(void)
>>
>> data.xmlopt = xmlopt;
>>
>> -#define DO_TEST_FULL(name, use_fips) \
>> - data.base = name; \
>> - data.fips = use_fips; \
>> - if (virtTestRun(name, testQemuCaps, &data) < 0) \
>> +#define DO_TEST(name) \
>> + data.base = name; \
>> + if (virtTestRun(name, testQemuCaps, &data) < 0) \
>
> We are not very consistent on whether multiline macros should align the
> \ to the same column.
That's true, I've changed the align of '\' to the same column.
>
>> ret = -1
>
> Eww - we really did that in a multiline macro? I'd much rather fix
> things to use:
>
> do {
> data.base = name;
> if (virtTestRun(name, testQemuCaps, &data) < 0)
> ret = -1;
> } while (0)
Thanks, pushed with this change.
Pavel
>
> as long as we are touching the code.
>
> ACK.
>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list