[libvirt] retiring v0.9.6-maint

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Any objections to retiring the v0.9.6-maint branch?  After all, we have
> already retired the v0.9.11-maint branch
> (http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=cd0d348ed), and the
> only activity on v0.9.6-maint since 0.9.6.4 was released in January 2013
> was the backport of a single CVE fix.  The branch no longer builds
> cleanly on Fedora 20, and while I could identify patches to backport to
> fix the build situation, it's not worth my time if we can just retire
> the branch.

FWIW, I'm not really a fan of deleting the branches. Is there any harm
to just leaving it there idle ?

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|