[libvirt] [PATCH 02/10] conf: support backend domain name in disk and network devices

Eric Blake eblake at redhat.com
Fri Feb 6 19:02:36 UTC 2015


On 02/06/2015 11:11 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:36:40PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 06:17:08AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> At least Xen supports backend drivers in another domain (aka "driver
>>> domain"). This patch introduces XML config option for such setting as
>>> 'domain' attribute of 'source' element. Verification its content is left
>>> for the driver.
>>>

> 
> Ok, but perhaps some better name? When I read something like:
> <interface type='bridge'>
>   <ip address='1.2.3.4'/>
>   <domain name='netvm'/>
> </interface>
> it is really not obvious what domain this is about. When the same would
> be supported for PCI passthrough, it will be even more confusing:
> <interface type='hostdev' managed='yes'>
>   <driver name='vfio'/>
>   <source>
>     <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x0'/>
>   </source>
>   <mac address='52:54:00:6d:90:02'/>
>   <domain name='netvm'/>
> </interface>
> 
> Any ideas for a better name?

Maybe allow a new type of <driver> element?

<interface type='hostdev' managed='yes'>
  <driver name='domain-vfio'>
    <domain name='netvm'/>
  </driver>
  <source>...</source>
</interface>

Maybe not. But I agree that we want to nail the XML naming convention first.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 604 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20150206/43375610/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list