[libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: Check for negative port values in network drive configuration

Martin Kletzander mkletzan at redhat.com
Fri Feb 20 17:08:27 UTC 2015


On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:28:44PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 02/19/2015 08:53 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
>> We interpret port values as signed int (convert them from char *),
>> so if a negative value is provided in network disk's configuration,
>> we accept it as valid, however there's an 'unknown cause' error raised later.
>> This error is only accidental because we return the port value in the return code.
>> This patch adds just a minor tweak to the already existing check so we
>> reject negative values the same way as we reject non-numerical strings.
>>
>> Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163553
>> ---
>>  src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>> index 743d6f0..c1e9559 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>> @@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ qemuNetworkDriveGetPort(int protocol,
>>      int ret = 0;
>>
>>      if (port) {
>> -        if (virStrToLong_i(port, NULL, 10, &ret) < 0) {
>> +        if (virStrToLong_i(port, NULL, 10, &ret) < 0 || ret < 0) {
>>              virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>>                             _("failed to parse port number '%s'"),
>>                             port);
>
>Won't this still allow wraparound (an extremely large negative input
>that gets parsed as positive)?  Wouldn't it be better to switch to
>virStrToLong_uip to force a positive number parse?
>

No it won't, virStrToLong_*() functions handle this properly.  We use
this parsing for other integers as well.  I don't know what I would do
if our *integer* variant isn't good for parsing *integers* ;-)

So I'd say ACK from my POV.

>--
>Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
>Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>



>--
>libvir-list mailing list
>libvir-list at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20150220/c4fdcd6a/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list