[libvirt] [libvirt-glib PATCHv5 7/7] gobject: Add wrapper for virNetworkGetDHCPLeases

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Mon Jul 20 17:32:37 UTC 2015

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> And all that data is completely irrelevant for the reason I mentioned
> again and again.

Now that we have the data, and that it goes your way, yes you can say
it's irrelevant ;) What if instead, it turned out only f22 was shipping a
new enough libvirt? I would have reverted your patch and added some

> Please point to at least one actual example of any
> distro wanting to upgrade libvirt-glib to latest while wanting to keep
> an year old release of libvirt and you'll have a point.

The point of looking up that information was actually to be able to make
an informed decision as to whether there may be distros wanting to do
that or not. Which is why I was asking for that data, and I now feel
more confident that this is indeed not going to be an issue. It really
took 10 minutes to gather, much less time than arguing that this
information is not needed ;)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20150720/168ca46c/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the libvir-list mailing list