[libvirt] [libvirt-glib PATCHv5 7/7] gobject: Add wrapper for virNetworkGetDHCPLeases

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeeshanak at gnome.org
Tue Jul 21 11:47:51 UTC 2015

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> And all that data is completely irrelevant for the reason I mentioned
>> again and again.
> Now that we have the data, and that it goes your way, yes you can say
> it's irrelevant ;)

Not at all, I didn't even care to see if it goes "my way" or not. It's
completely irrelevant and I'm getting tired of pointing out the very
obvious reason why that is the case.

> What if instead, it turned out only f22 was shipping a
> new enough libvirt? I would have reverted your patch and added some
> #ifdef.

That would have been fine by me, as already explained.

What it did boil down in the end to was you being way too caring about
downstream than me and hence ugly solutions are acceptable to you. I
really don't see us able to change each other's mind on that and hence
the reason I wanted a vote rather in the first place to avoid this


Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/

More information about the libvir-list mailing list