[libvirt] Replace AF_LOCAL with AF_PACKET
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Fri Jul 31 14:23:59 UTC 2015
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:10:24PM +0100, Ben Gray wrote:
> I've a question on whether it's 'safe' to change the socket type used in
> virNetxxx calls from AF_PACKET to AF_LOCAL ?
> The reason I ask is that we're using libvirt-lxc with a couple of bridge
> interfaces, and we've found that the socket close call on AF_PACKET type
> sockets takes between 40ms and 60ms. For our container config there is
> roughly 12 close calls on AF_PACKET sockets, delaying the start-up of the
> LXC container by around 450ms.
> So a simple fix to speed up our container start-up is to just switch
> from AF_PACKET to AF_LOCAL sockets. Hence my question on whether we can
> safely do this, or is there some reason why AF_PACKET was chosen ?
AFAIK, there's no particular reason why we chose AF_PACKET - we were
probably just copying code somewhere else. Looking at the kernel code
it seems the various ioctls() we do are accepted on any type of socket
family. So if AF_LOCAL works, I don't see a reason not to change it.
We should probably test old distro like RHEL5 to be sure there's no
historical reason for it though.
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list