[libvirt] [PATCH 00/13] PCIe fixes + new PCI controllers w/RFC

Ján Tomko jtomko at redhat.com
Thu Jun 25 09:46:41 UTC 2015


On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:44:17AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:04:33PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> >At this point you can see that it all comes down to what name we want to
> >give the subelement; within that, we give the exact name of the qemu
> >device, and the exact name/value of any qemu options that we set to
> >non-default values.
> >
> >Somebody *please* have an opinion on the name for this, because none of
> >these strikes me as better or worse (well, I think I dislike <driver>
> >
> 
> To be honest, I kinds dislike all of them.  Not that they would be
> chosen poorly, no, it's simply because the good sensible choice is
> unavailable due to another poor decision in the past (this may be
> another point for Michal's talk on KVM Forum).  Thinking about it I
> must say I don't like how target (which is supposed to match a place
> where the device appears for the guest) is used for the model
> specification, on the other hand (ab)using 'model' element for the
> specification of an "address" in guest (that's what I understand
> chassis and port are) doesn't feel any better.  What if we go with two
> of those elements?  Would that be too much pain?  E.g.:
> 
>   <controller type='pci model='pci-root-port' index='3'>
>     <address type='pci' bus='0' slot='4' function='1'>
>     <model type='ioh3420'/>
>     <target chassis='3' port='0x21'/>
>   </controller>

I like this, essentially a subModel without the camelCase.
One small nit: <model name='ioh4320'/> would look nicer to me,
but we're using <model type=/> in at least one other place,
so I'm fine with both.

Jan

> 
> I understand this might look like an overkill, but I think it's better
> safe then sorry, I guess I just see us not so far in the future
> regretting any decision made now.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20150625/9c1be3d4/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list