[libvirt] [PATCH v3 2/5] virsh: Improve vshCommandOptTimeoutToMs().
Andrea Bolognani
abologna at redhat.com
Tue Jun 2 09:27:31 UTC 2015
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 15:09 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> > int
> > vshCommandOptTimeoutToMs(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd, int *timeout)
> > {
> > - int rv = vshCommandOptInt(cmd, "timeout", timeout);
> > + int ret;
> > + unsigned int utimeout;
> >
> > - if (rv < 0 || (rv > 0 && *timeout < 1)) {
> > + if ((ret = vshCommandOptUInt(cmd, "timeout", &utimeout)) < 0)
>
> This changes the logic such that utimeout == 0 doesn't get messaged like
> it would have previously if *timeout was == 0 (or < 1).
My bad. I've added a bunch of test cases to v4 so that something like
this is unlikely to slip through the cracks again.
> > vshError(ctl,
> > _("Numeric value for <%s> option is malformed or out of range"),
> > "timeout");
> > - return -1;
> > - }
> > - if (rv > 0) {
> > - /* Ensure that we can multiply by 1000 without overflowing. */
> > - if (*timeout > INT_MAX / 1000) {
> > - vshError(ctl, "%s", _("timeout is too big"));
> > - return -1;
> > - }
> > - *timeout *= 1000;
> > + if (ret <= 0)
>
> s/<=/==
>
> It cannot be < due to previous check. So no option, returns 0
This is actually correct: if the value returned by vshCommandOptUInt()
is negative, an error is reported; an early return is then performed if
the value was <= 0, which means either an error, or no value provided
for an non-mandatory option.
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Ensure that we can multiply by 1000 without overflowing. */
> > + if (utimeout > INT_MAX / 1000) {
> > + vshError(ctl, "%s", _("timeout is too big"));
>
> s/big/long
>
> (ironically ;-))
I've changed it to report the common error message instead, because this
is really an out-of-range condition. Same for zero. If you feel like a
more specific error message is warranted here we can definitely do that,
I don't feel strongly either way :)
Cheers.
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team
$ python -c "print('a'.join(['', 'bologn', '@redh', 't.com']))"
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list