[libvirt] direct device assignment

Michal Privoznik mprivozn at redhat.com
Wed Mar 4 15:59:29 UTC 2015


On 04.03.2015 16:27, Raymond Durand wrote:
> I read this in the context of direct device assignment: "All of the
> guest's memory must kept permanently in memory. This is because the
> guest may program the device with any address in its address space and
> the hypervisor has no way of handling a DMA page fault"
> 
> is it still true?

Yes.

Michal




More information about the libvir-list mailing list