[libvirt] direct device assignment
Michal Privoznik
mprivozn at redhat.com
Wed Mar 4 15:59:29 UTC 2015
On 04.03.2015 16:27, Raymond Durand wrote:
> I read this in the context of direct device assignment: "All of the
> guest's memory must kept permanently in memory. This is because the
> guest may program the device with any address in its address space and
> the hypervisor has no way of handling a DMA page fault"
>
> is it still true?
Yes.
Michal
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list