[libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] util: Produce friendlier error message to user
lhuang
lhuang at redhat.com
Mon Oct 12 08:42:15 UTC 2015
On 10/09/2015 10:27 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
> On 10/08/2015 05:12 AM, lhuang wrote:
>>
>> On 10/02/2015 11:54 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> On 09/30/2015 12:01 AM, Luyao Huang wrote:
>>>> Commit 1c24cfe9 fix the problem in virNumaSetPagePoolSize,
>>>> this patch just like it and fix the issue in another function.
>>>>
>>>> when user use freepages and specify a invalid node or page size,
>>>> will get error like this:
>>>>
>>>> # virsh freepages 0 1
>>>> error: Failed to open file
>>>> '/sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-1kB/free_hugepages':
>>>> No such file or directory
>>>>
>>>> Add two checks to catch this and therefore produce much more
>>>> friendlier error messages.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhuang at redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> src/util/virnuma.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/src/util/virnuma.c b/src/util/virnuma.c
>>>> index 8577bd8..c8beade 100644
>>>> --- a/src/util/virnuma.c
>>>> +++ b/src/util/virnuma.c
>>>> @@ -560,6 +560,12 @@ virNumaGetHugePageInfo(int node,
>>>> page_size, "nr_hugepages") < 0)
>>>> goto cleanup;
>>>> + if (!virFileExists(path)) {
>>>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, "%s",
>>>> + _("page size or NUMA node not available"));
>>> duh - meant to add:
>>>
>>> as perhaps a "patch 2" of the series (making this patch 3) - would it be
>>> perhaps better to indicate "page size of "%u" or NUMA node "%d" not
>>> available", using page_size, node as the arguments?
>>>
>>> ??
>> Good idea, and how about make the code like this:
>>
>> diff --git a/src/util/virnuma.c b/src/util/virnuma.c
>> index cb80972..8d85dc3 100644
>> --- a/src/util/virnuma.c
>> +++ b/src/util/virnuma.c
>> @@ -553,6 +553,19 @@ virNumaGetHugePageInfo(int node,
>> page_size, "nr_hugepages") < 0)
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> + if (!virFileExists(path)) {
>> + if (node != -1 && !virNumaNodeIsAvailable(node)) {
>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
>> + _("NUMA node %d is not available"),
>> + node);
>> + } else {
>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
>> + _("page size %u is not available"),
>> + page_size);
>> + }
>> + goto cleanup;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (virFileReadAll(path, 1024, &buf) < 0)
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> @@ -572,6 +585,19 @@ virNumaGetHugePageInfo(int node,
>> page_size, "free_hugepages") < 0)
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> + if (!virFileExists(path)) {
>> + if (node != -1 && !virNumaNodeIsAvailable(node)) {
>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
>> + _("NUMA node %d is not available"),
>> + node);
>> + } else {
>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
>> + _("page size %u is not available"),
>> + page_size);
>> + }
>> + goto cleanup;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (virFileReadAll(path, 1024, &buf) < 0)
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> @@ -836,19 +862,19 @@ virNumaSetPagePoolSize(int node,
>> goto cleanup;
>> }
>>
>> - if (node != -1 && !virNumaNodeIsAvailable(node)) {
>> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
>> - _("NUMA node %d is not available"),
>> - node);
>> - goto cleanup;
>> - }
>> -
>> if (virNumaGetHugePageInfoPath(&nr_path, node, page_size,
>> "nr_hugepages") < 0)
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> - if (!virFileExists(nr_path)) {
>> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, "%s",
>> - _("page size or NUMA node not available"));
>> + if (!virFileExists(path)) {
> s/path/nr_path/ ;-)
Thanks pointing out that, i wrote them too fast, so you know... :)
>
>> + if (node != -1 && !virNumaNodeIsAvailable(node)) {
>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
>> + _("NUMA node %d is not available"),
>> + node);
>> + } else {
>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
>> + _("page size %u is not available"),
>> + page_size);
> This part of the message could be displayed when node == -1 in the event
> that !virNumaNodeIsAvailable is false. I think that's right based on
> what virNumaGetHugePageInfoPath does, but I just want to make sure that
> is what you'd expect...
Yes, this is expected, since if node == -1 we will check the
/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/* path, if we get failed, then means the
hugepage size is not valid.
> Conversely if page_size != -1, then would it make sense to add the
> page_size or not? That is, sure page_size 'x' is not available, but
> would it make sense to say "NUMA node 1 is not available for page size
> 2048"? IDC either way, but what if NUMA node 1 does exist, but the
> specified page size doesn't?
I guess you want to say "if node != -1" ? yes, report error like "NUMA
node 1 is not available for page size 2048" will be more clearly in the
case which node is exist but the page_size is not.
>> + }
>> goto cleanup;
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> We need check if node == -1 to avoid output error include "NUMA node
>> "-1" ", and instead of check the nodeset again and again, i think just
>> check them when we cannot find the file (!virFileExists(nr_path)),
>> check the return from virNumaNodeIsAvailable() to output different error.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your reply and help.
>>
> Let's have you create a v2... Insert the "virNumaSetPagePoolSize" change
> as patch #2 with the adjusted code path and error message. The commit
> message should mention commit id '1c24cfe9' and that you're looking to
> make the error message/path cleare.
>
> They the current patch 2 becomes patch 3 with the similar code or
> whatever else you've considered doing.
Okay, i will post a new version these days.
> I can adjust commit messages for syntax/english...
Thanks a lot for your help, so i just leave the old commit messages when
write a new version ?
I think you (and people who help me to improve the commit) nearly become
my English teacher :D
> John
Luyao
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list