[libvirt] [PATCH v2 2/2] virsh: Enhance the detailed output of domblklist for networked source
Michal Privoznik
mprivozn at redhat.com
Fri Sep 4 08:26:07 UTC 2015
On 03.09.2015 22:47, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/02/2015 11:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> From: Lin Ma <lma at suse.com>
>>
>> Format & output more detailed information about networked source
>>
>> e.g: The output without the patch:
>> $ virsh domblklist $DOMAIN --details
>> Type Device Target Source
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> network disk vda test-pool/image
>> network disk vdb iqn.2015-08.org.example:sn01/0
>> network disk vdc /image.raw
>> network disk vdd -
>> network disk vde -
>> network disk vdf image1
>> network disk vdg test-volume/image.raw
>>
>> The output with the patch:
>> $ virsh domblklist $DOMAIN --details
>> Type Device Target Source
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> network disk vda rbd://monitor1.example.org:6321/test-pool/image
>> network disk vdb iscsi://192.168.124.200:3260/iqn.2015-08.org.example:sn01/0
>> network disk vdc http://192.168.124.200:80/image.raw
>> network disk vdd nbd+unix:///var/run/nbdsock
>> network disk vde nbd://192.168.124.200:12345
>> network disk vdf sheepdog://192.168.124.200:6000/image1
>> network disk vdg gluster://192.168.124.200/test-volume/image.raw
>
> Is the goal to just format in some "standard" format or to use the
> format that would be used by qemu in the command line?
While it's the former, I think we should at least cover asses and
document that these strings have no special meaning and can change later
if we find a better way of expressing them. Or should we?
Michal
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list