[libvirt] [PATCH 4/6] virsh: Resolve Coverity DEADCODE

[Ján Tomko]

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:18:31PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> Use 'dead_error_condition' instead of 'dead_error_begin'
> 

Just wondering - what is the difference?
Doesn't dead_error_begin require a dead_error_end?

> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/virsh.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

ACK.

Jan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20150924/1f014042/attachment-0001.sig>