[libvirt] [PATCH 3/3] testutils: Drop virtTestResult
mkletzan at redhat.com
Wed Sep 30 05:39:41 UTC 2015
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 07:56:47PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>virtTestResult is suboptimal for a few reasons:
>- It poorly duplicates virtTestRun pass/fail reporting logic
>- It doesn't have virtTestRun's alloc testing support
>- It only reports the test name _after_ the test has run.
>- It doesn't follow the standard virtTestRun pattern that most other
> tests use.
>There's no users left, so drop it. If any other async tests like eventtest
>spring up that don't cleanly fit the virtTestRun pattern, I suggest they
>just open code the support for it around virtTestRun
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the libvir-list