[libvirt] [PATCH] docs: Update style for <dt> elements
John Ferlan
jferlan at redhat.com
Thu Apr 21 14:10:01 UTC 2016
On 04/21/2016 09:32 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:04 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Add bolding for <dt> elements to make them "stick out" on the page rather
>> that just a stream of text where the <dt> elements only differ by slightly
>> different font style since most uses encase the text within using <code>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I had suggested this during a review of Andrea's changes late last month:
>>
>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-March/msg01501.html
>>
>> but figure I'll make the more 'formal' patch request...
>
> Yeah, sorry about that. I just forgot :(
>
I figured... no big deal.
>> docs/generic.css | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/generic.css b/docs/generic.css
>> index 208e31e..b86bb88 100644
>> --- a/docs/generic.css
>> +++ b/docs/generic.css
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ ul, ol {
>> dt {
>> margin-left: 1em;
>> margin-right: 2em;
>> + font-weight: bold;
>> }
>>
>> dl dd {
>
> This styling is appropriate when the content of <dt> is a
> <code> element, because that makes the font smaller.
>
> This is the case for most of the <dt>s in our documentation,
> but not *all* of them. I've just posted a patch[1] that fixes
> a bunch of <dt>s that were missing the inner <code> element,
> but that still leaves out a few that are just not supposed to
> have it - look no further than contact.html for an example.
>
> So my proposal is, apply my patch first, and then add
>
> dt code {
> font-weight: bold;
> }
>
> to the stylesheet instead.
>
> Sounds good?
I saw your series - been a VERY BUSY day on libvir-list... In any case
wouldn't that make *all* <code> elements bolded - there's a lot more of
those and then the <dt> bolding wouldn't stand out
John
>
>
> [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg01476.html
> --
> Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization Team
>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list