[libvirt] RFC filesystem pool proposal description.

Maxim Nestratov mnestratov at virtuozzo.com
Fri Apr 29 16:12:31 UTC 2016


28.04.2016 20:45, Maxim Nestratov пишет:

> 28.04.2016 20:29, Daniel P. Berrange пишет:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:57:14PM +0300, Olga Krishtal wrote:
>>> In this proposal description we would like to introduce a separate pool
>>> type:fspool. Fspool provides and manages filesystems.
>>> Below are listed possible examples of fspool, depending on source type:
>>> volume, directory or network.
>> I'm struggling a little to understand what the overal purpose is
>> here. Can you step back a level and describe the overall problem
>> you're facing and what your use cases / goals are for this proposal.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniel
>
> The main purpose of this is to have a generic API to manage 
> filesystems similar to storage API and be able to use these 
> filesystems in domain XMLs defining containers.
> So ,it is a kind of abstraction of filesystem sources and backends. 
> Also there can be some indirect benefits but they are not the aim.
>
> Maxim
>

I wonder, if my reply clarify the original message or it's still unclear 
and it's better to step back more and describe the problem in more details?

> -- 
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




More information about the libvir-list mailing list