[libvirt] [PATCH] lxc: monitor now holds a reference to the domain
Michal Privoznik
mprivozn at redhat.com
Thu Dec 8 14:03:43 UTC 2016
On 06.12.2016 15:39, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote:
> If the monitor doesn't hold a reference to the domain object
> the object may be destroyed before the monitor actually stops.
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc_monitor.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_monitor.c b/src/lxc/lxc_monitor.c
> index d828d52..de63f9e 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_monitor.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_monitor.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ virLXCMonitorPtr virLXCMonitorNew(virDomainObjPtr vm,
> memcpy(&mon->cb, cb, sizeof(mon->cb));
>
> virObjectRef(mon);
> + virObjectRef(vm);
You can move this a few lines above: mon->vm = virObjectRef(vm); if you
want.
> virNetClientSetCloseCallback(mon->client, virLXCMonitorEOFNotify, mon,
> virLXCMonitorCloseFreeCallback);
>
> @@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ virLXCMonitorPtr virLXCMonitorNew(virDomainObjPtr vm,
>
> error:
> virObjectUnref(mon);
> + virObjectUnref(vm);
This doesn't feel right. Imagine something bad happened before @vm got
ref'd (the first hunk). The control jumps over to error label and unref
@vm even though it hasn't been ref'd yet.
Or worse - @mon has exactly one reference (we are creating it here in
this function), therefore the above unref(mon) causes the MonitorDispose
callback to be called, which unrefs the @vm again. Fortunately, this
scenario is currently impossible as there's no 'goto error' after
@mon->vm is set, but you get my point.
> mon = NULL;
> goto cleanup;
> }
> @@ -201,6 +203,7 @@ static void virLXCMonitorDispose(void *opaque)
> if (mon->cb.destroy)
> (mon->cb.destroy)(mon, mon->vm);
> virObjectUnref(mon->program);
> + virObjectUnref(mon->vm);
> }
>
>
>
ACK if you drop the 2nd hunk.
Michal
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list